| | Les droits des homosexuels et les droits des autres | | |
07/11/11 | Commentaires [47] | |
| | | | | Modifier la taille du texte: | A | | | A | | |
|
| Les droits des homosexuels sont des droits humains. Tout un chacun doit le reconnaître. Ils ont des droits tout comme chaque être humain a des droits. Comme pour chaque être humain, leurs droits s’arrêtent là où le droit d’un autre commence. Lutter contre la discrimination envers eux est un bon objectif que nous partageons, mais que cela soit fait sans attenter aux droits des autres. Là où il y a problème, c’est que la façon la plus facile de lutter contre la discrimination c’est de banaliser l’homosexualité. Cédant à la tentation de la facilité, c’est le moyen que la plupart emploient sans se soucier d’aller contre d’autres droits. La société a deux devoirs envers l’homosexualité :
● Veiller à ce qu’il n’y ait pas de discrimination contre les homosexuels.
● Limiter l’extension de l’homosexualité en ne créant pas des situations qui encouragent sa prévalence.
Nos enfants ont droit à un enseignement qui ne déforme pas les choses. L’homosexualité n’est pas l’idéal pour une personne. A l’adolescence, une étape de l’évolution affective se manifeste par une attirance vers un autre du même sexe. C’est transitoire. L’évolution se poursuivant, l’attirance changera de direction. Banaliser l’homosexualité pourrait faire le/la jeune se croire homosexuel/ le et se fixer à ce state de son évolution – ce qui pourrait arriver s’il/elle passe à l’acte. On aura ainsi porté atteinte au droit du jeune au déroulement normal de son évolution affective.
Le directeur de A1 Maurice cite des cas horribles de persécution des homosexuels. De tels faits ne se sont jamais produits à Maurice. Cela ne semble pas être un état de choses que nous devons craindre ici. Et, banaliser l’homosexualité pour lutter contre la discrimination pourrait avoir l’effet contraire. Si la plupart des Mauriciens ne désirent aucunement discriminer les homosexuels, la crainte de l’impact de la banalisation sur nos enfants, nos jeunes, pourrait développer une attitude hostile. Les «gay parades», par exemple, produisent cet effet. Les droits humains des homosexuels ne peuvent inclure le droit au mariage. Car le mariage signifie une union entre un homme et une femme qui, ensemble, vont fonder un foyer où naîtront probablement des enfants. Ce n’est pas le cas des homosexuels.
Autrement, ce serait changer la signification du mot mariage. Plus difficile peut-être, mais plus juste, serait, pour atteindre l’objectif de lutte contre la discrimination, d’accentuer le droit de chaque personne à être respecté en tant que personne humaine, qu’elle soit différente ou non. Tous les êtres humains n’ont pas les mêmes comportements dans tous les domaines. Certains peuvent être désapprouvés par d’autres, mais ils ont tous les mêmes droits humains. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Les dernières reactions | | | All homophobia is based on ignorance and arrogance | | | Nawal Husnoo Jul 20, 2011 | | | I just want to sum up the results of this discussion. All homophobia is based on ignorance and arrogance. A small minority of self-hating, repressed gay/bi homophobes, and a minority of religious-literalists falsely claim to be the voice of "the people", and advance a countable number of false arguments based on ignorance and personal arrogance. All of these false arguments can be easily shown to be wrong and inapplicable. I have demonstrated this on my blog: http://husnoo.com/blog/jacqueline_le_blanc. Most opposition to equal civil rights for gay men, women and couples are based on these arguments from ignorance and arrogance, and most homophobes are in fact intelligent, rational and emotionally stable people. Once they are shown why it is unfair to deny equal civil rights to gay people and their misconceptions are cleared, they are happy to support their gay relatives and neighbours. Together, we can make Mauritius a safer place for all people, heterosexual or gay, people of all colours, races, religions and political views. | | | Human rights | | | Nawal Husnoo Jul 18, 2011 | | | The right to Famly is a fundamental Human Right, guaranteed by the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 12: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. Article 16: Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. [...] The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. | | | OMO needs to find love. | | | Nawal Husnoo Jul 18, 2011 | | | OMO, I fully understand your point. I am very sorry to hear you have no love in your life. I wish it were different, I wish you had someone to care for, someone who would care for you. I find it very sad that your idea of sex and marriage is the same as George Orwell described in the book 1984, quoted below. In the real world, for loving couples, the act of sex represents and provides the ultimate tool for emotional bonding, keeping the couple together in the face of adversity. Religious, self-righteous and self-proclaimed "tradional" people have as much sex as anybody else, except they feel guilty about it: http://www.goo.gl/b7NYS. --- G. Orwell: "Among Party members all love and eroticism was removed from the sex act. Marriages were permitted, but they had to be officially approved and were to be undertaken for the sole purpose of begetting children who would grow up to be responsible Party members. Permission would be denied if the couple showed any signs of being physically attracted to each other. Ideally the Party would prefer complete celibacy, which would mean that men and women would forge fewer bonds of individual loyalties and children could be produced artificially. Failing this, it tried to present the sex act as a rather disgusting preliminary necessity." | | | homos | | | OMO Jul 18, 2011 | | | To all the human rights defenders of this forum : plse do understand that me too stand for the homos human rights to be respected. Human rights means human rights , not to to amalgamate with civil rights. Civil rights are very often the results of a political trade off between parties to achieve an 'agreement' on something on which in fact cannot be agreed. i do respect homos , and i have friends who are homos , but there is no HUMAN sense into believing and promoting homosexual acts between humans. Apart from the pleasure aspect of sex - iam sure in either hetero or gay sex- one should to oneself , what is the ultimate fruit of the sexual act ? I leave the answer to each one of us as everyone has a his/her own view of HUMAN LIFE. | | | Achievement Unlocked. | | | Nawal Husnoo Jul 15, 2011 | | | I rest my case. | | | Voir plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|