samedi 26 mai 2012
Lexpress.mu en page d'accueil | newsletter | archives | rss
header
Météo Avis de décès Horoscope   
header
The call of the clarion
Mgr Ian Ernest Bishop of Mauritius
02/10/11 | Commentaires [12]
Modifier la taille du texte:A | A
comment
Commentaires
rate
Noter l'article
share
Partager et classer cet article

An open letter to my fellow citizens

I find myself increasingly distressed by some of the goings-on in our country and have decided, in all humility to share a few ideas and reflections with you. For me, the final straw has been the savage murder at Corps de Garde, and one of a series of violent incidents over the last weekend of 5-6 February 2011.
 
The recent performance for the commemoration of the Abolition of Slavery at Le Morne also left me feeling distinctly uneasy. Apart from the fact that the parallel between the slave trade (none of the slaves had any choice in the matter) and being enslaved by drugs or alcohol is somewhat forced, it was unfortunate that the performers were from one community only, inevitably suggesting that drugs, alcohol and prostitution are the problems of one community. The scale of drug and alcohol abuse is, of course, a symbol of a social malaise, but it is not the only sign around us.

Since Independence, our country has seen a great deal of progress, for which some of our leaders must be given considerable credit. At the same time, however, some perversions have crept into our society and, if they are not properly tackled soon, we run the risk of even greater problems in the future. I suspect that our main problems stem from a breakdown in ethical standards, and even the non-existence of ethical perspectives.

Given the amount of “religious” activity in our country, this might seem somewhat surprising. However, to state what we are too often afraid to say, some of this religious activity seems more confined to the promotion of ethnic identity than to the pursuit of spiritual and human understanding. This is a basic problem, all too often spoken of as “the Mauritian reality” and therefore swept under the carpet, that all we religious leaders need to address.

Ethics

Let us be clear. Ethical standards are something that all of us can promote, whatever our religion and even those who have no religion. They may be connected with religious dogmas and beliefs but they are more universal.

Ethics relate to how we behave. We can all agree that using violence, selling drugs, dishonest business dealings, pursuing financial gain at the expense of others, abusing one’s position and corruption amongst other things are deeply unethical. We can expect our leaders to set an example but the problem lies not just with our leaders. The woman who tells a political candidate she is not voting for him because he won’t or can’t provide her son with a job is unethical. The person who draws his or her salary without working properly is unethical. Work, whether as a teacher, a doctor, a politician or as a labourer, has vocational aspects it has responsibilities as well as privileges.

As recent events have illustrated, some people, from the highest to the lowest in society, seem oblivious to ethical factors. There will always be “black sheep” in most families and societies but it is the sheer scale of this that is frightening.

How this has come about would, no doubt, require a book in itself. But, put simply, there are certain factors in our society that particularly contribute to this situation. It includes the perception that political, religious and community leaders are concerned more with their personal advantages than with the members of society they are meant to serve. It comes from the feeling that some people can get away with anything. Political cronyism and ethnic considerations are major factors. There is all too often a clear absence of meritocracy. The resulting perceptions permeate down through society so that, to take a banal example, one begins to wonder if someone imagines they can get away with murder (literally and figuratively) because they voted for the party in power at the time of their crime.

To give some examples of a flagrant lack of ethics, politics is not about pleasing potential voters and key interest groups, but in serving the country and providing leadership. Teaching is not about the extra income from private tuition but the privileged position of educating our youngsters for tomorrow. Practising medicine is not pushing patients towards private treatment to earn more money. Business is not just about increasing stakeholder wealth but also about genuinely valuing employees and offering customers quality goods and services at a fair price. Journalism is not about distorting the truth to suit one’s own point of view but of providing readers with factual information and informed comment. Religious leadership is not about seeking advantages for a particular group of people but of providing ethical guidance, spiritual help and support to individuals in facing life’s problems.

It is not my intention to criticise any particular individual, individuals or groups of people, although, if anyone does feel offended, it is presumably because the truth can hurt. We face a society-wide problem. Nor are we alone in this most other societies in varying ways and to varying degrees face similar problems. But it is in the society in which we live that we have to address the problems and look for solutions.

Steps to be taken

In the first place, therefore, I would urge our Prime Minister to ensure that the Equal Opportunities Act is promulgated at the earliest opportunity and without further delay. I would also ask our political leaders to give urgent priority to the formulation and introduction of an anti-racism/anti-communalism bill. The strains on society caused by ethnic fragmentation are too great to continue ignoring them. Of course, such a measure would provoke outrage in some quarters, where vested interests prevail, but the time is always right for us to “fight the good fight with all thy might”.

Corruption, cronyism and the way public money is spent need more serious attention, including a major change in mindset amongst some of those drawing salaries from the public purse.

What else can be done? I would suggest the setting up of some sort of Social Advisory Council or Think-Tank at several arms length from Government to examine problems and offer solutions. And here, I am not talking about lengthening prison sentences or the use of the death penalty, neither of which has been shown to have any useful impact on crime, and that without considering moral factors. I am talking about such things as how to educate society and how to bring in legislation and reforms that will have a genuine impact.

All this needs not just political will but the awakening of all members of society to the realisation that it is more than time to address our problems, each individual in his or her own way.

I have not spoken of poverty. In part, this is partly being addressed but it has to be addressed properly and in a global way. Building houses for a potential bank of votes is not poverty alleviation. Some poverty is, of course, self-inflicted, through addiction to drugs or alcohol and is difficult to address. But we are a small country, where nothing should be considered impossible because of the sheer scale of a problem. And I do not believe that poverty in itself is at the root of social evils, although it may exacerbate life’s difficulties.

There are plenty of poor people who lead decent lives. There are plenty of rich people who are greedy and devoid of any moral sensibility.

To our leaders, I would say, please do not fail us. To my fellow countrymen, I would add that we all have an individual responsibility to make a difference. There are too many ways that we have all failed.


The Most Revd Ian Ernest Bishop of Mauritius
And Archbishop of the Province of the Indian Ocean

09 February 2011

 


  
print
Imprimer
Envoyer
Envoyer
save
Sauvegarder
Les dernières reactions
Fight Against the Contagion of Anomie
Par:-Tryptophan Feb 13, 2011
The Archbishop has spoken of the societal lack of morality/ethics. He could perhaps have delved deeper in the role of our educational institutions to make some recommendations. Isn't it true that our educational system has had the social-psychological impact of a mentality of competition ( “ I can do better than you, or worse than you,’’ depending on one's value system) which now permeates all aspects of our life? Our educationists, and pedagogues have presided over an educational system which promotes an "elitism" of the minority , leaving the rest without much of a goal, or life structure, or hope of a career, to fend for themselves... We are all responsible, albeit in inadvertence, for the gradual creeping in of individualism and the development of impersonal social relations. Where are the days when villages and towns had sports clubs, literary circles, Boys’ or Girls’ Scouts, Young Farmers, etc. which brought local residents of all ages and religions together? What has happened to that value system which embodied not only the expectations of different professionals in their roles but also the respect that those roles commanded, testimony of the sheer diligence of those professionals then. We had local school head teachers visiting pupils’s families in their homes when that was necessary. We had village nurses who did not mind being awaken up late at night when a local resident was taken ill and needed some advice. We had school teachers who gave extended classes “with no price tags attached”. It would be futile now to spend time and effort to research the factors that have led to the dwindling of our value system to the present state of anomie. ( In only the past two weeks I have personally read about at least two cases of suicide in our country, both related to some form of mental illness: not that I want to frighten anybody, but you or someone you know could be next!). In a time when the people of Egypt and Tunisia are proving that the “people can claim power” we have no other option but to throw our egoism out of the window, gather our resources AGAIN , and engage ourselves in activities within our local neighbourhood to render our lives, and those of our families, better and more secure, whether or not with state support. Voluntarism should be on our lips and in our hearts!
EOA & competence
Par:-Public Feb 11, 2011
If the EOA is approved, I will do all to know on which ground any civil servant (teacher, doctor, engineer, etc) was recruited before accepting his/her service. If it is known that the person was recruited mostly thanks to the hatred quota system then, I will do all possible to avoid such person! So because, it's competence alone that will serve me; nothing else!
EOA ek brain drain
Par:-Reader Feb 11, 2011
Si EOA aprouve be mo pou al dan enn pay kot meritocrtie respekter ek si possib, mo pou essay vann mo later a bann mauvai etranger!
discrimination
Par:-Taxpayer Feb 11, 2011
On tue la meritocratie en jetant la boue sur le systeme de laureat et en institutionalisant la discrimination religieuse pour le recrutement de travailleur.
Et la meritocratie?
Par:-Meritocrat Feb 11, 2011
Kestion ridicule; EST IL CONTRE LA MERITOCRACIE?
Voir plus
Vos Commentaires open close
Dans la Rubrique section: Tribune
Célébrons l’Afrique !
par Vijay MAKHAN
Avortement : Ne plus accepter une loi si cruelle et un tel outrage à la dignité humaine des femmes
Par Michel AHNEE
Make, Unmake, Remake and Unmake
By Anil Gayan
Rio+20 - La COI appelle la communauté internationale à placer le changement climatique au coeur des négociations
Par Callixte D’Offay, Secrétaire Général de la Commission de l’Océan Indien.
Essayer de comprendre
Par Nazim Esoof
Actualités|Sports|Génération Y|Mauriciens d'ailleurs|Opinion|Jobs|Immobilier|petites annonces
Contactez Nous | Code de Déontologie | Vos Commentaires | Sitemap
© Copyright La Sentinelle Limited 2010 | Designed & Hosted By: Designed & Developed By 4C plus