Publicité

“I have been disappointed by one single person”

1 octobre 2014, 12:29

Par

Partager cet article

Facebook X WhatsApp

“I have been disappointed by one single person”
Weekly speaks to the PMSD leader and former finance minister Xavier-Luc Duval on what it’s like to be out of power after nearly a decade, the terms of negotiations with the MSM and the ML and on the entry of his son, Adrien Duval, into politics.
 
■ You are out of cabinet after nine years in a row. What is your state of mind?
It’s very positive. Everyone has been very kind and supportive and very sympathetic to the cause I am defending. Also, we are on the eve of an electoral campaign, so I have been very busy. This campaign will decide the fate of this country, not just for the next five years but possibly for the next 40 years, since the two leaders are planning to change our constitution. I therefore feel it’s my duty to canvass people around the island to share my views on what is happening.
 
■ Do you mean there has been no disappointment since your resignation?
Well, there are certainly some people who treat you differently when you are no longer viceprime minister and minister of finance. That is certainly true. But it is a good thing since this enables you to be rid of people who are not sincere.
 
■ What about people in your own party?
I have no disappointment whatsoever regarding the few people who did not follow us into the opposition. You cannot change their nature. And that isn’t a problem for me. To be honest, I have been disappointed by one single person. Terribly disappointed!
 
■ Who?
Ishwur. That’s all I’m prepared to say.
 
■ Ishwur who? Chureethur?
I will say nothing more.. He’ll recognise himself. But it was a stab in the back.
 
■ But how could he have disappointed you more than those people whom you yourself appointed as the head of parastatals and various boards and refused to resign when you left?
No, that is not true. The party has shown exemplary solidarity. At the Financial Services Commission, Marc Hein, who was a political appointee, resigned.
 
■ There are still some of your own people sitting on that very board, aren’t there?
Ninety-five per cent of the board members resigned but we asked ambassadors to stay in place because they would have had to move their families etc. We also asked all full-time employees to stay in post as well for family reasons. Amongst the political appointees, Froget and Allet stayed but the others all left.
 
■ Did they not disappoint you?
I always expected that. Not everyone has the same approach to responsibility towards the party and the nation.
 
■ Now, you have been attacking the coalition in place, talking about the risk of changing the constitution, but on the opposite side, there is still no credible or even remotely united alternative, is there?
We’ve only been talking to the Mouvement Socialiste Militant (MSM) and the Mouvement Liberater (ML) for a short while. We do not want to rush into things. We want everyone to be comfortable with the arrangement. We aren’t talking about how to campaign for a few weeks. We are talking seriously about how to form the next government. It’s about proposing a government which will be comfortable in towns and villages. My ambition for Mauritius is different from what we have witnessed for the last nine years. I want a better future for Mauritius. Politics is the art of the possible and we will do what we can to make that better future possible. And I am not bitter about the break-up of the Labour Party-Parti Mauricien Social Démocrate (PMSD) alliance. We did well, but we could have done so much more together. I now have renewed ambition for my country.
 
■But how will you realise your ambition if you are embarking on a train which is taking onboard just about anybody?
At this stage, we are talking concretely about three parties, the MSM, PMSD and ML.
 
■ But Pravind Jugnauth stated his intention to negotiate with the MMSD and other willing parties, didn’t he?
At present, there are only three parties on the train.
 
■ But the train hasn’t reached its destination yet and will inevitably have to stop at some stations, won’t it?
It may have to but I just hope it’s an express train. It is a train but it isn’t a gravy train. To get there, it takes convincing people, being persuasive. This is happening at the moment.
 
■ Your secretary general spoke of you as the future prime minister, who should be leading the coalition. Do you have the same faith in yourself as he has in you?
(Long silence) If, at some stage in life I have the opportunity to serve in that position, I’ll be honoured to do so. But realistically speaking, that’s not for tomorrow. Maybe being prime minister is the destination – but not the next station.
 
■ The alternative alliance will be led by Sir Anerood Jugnauth (SAJ) as proposed prime minister. What is the hierarchy like in the alliance?
It will be a shared government. We will be happy with what is proposed. All the components of the population will be happy with that.
 
■ What would really make you satisfied in the coalition?
That’s what we are presently discussing. It is inappropriate to discuss such details in a newspaper at this point. It will eventually become public at some point.
 
■ Would you be happy with SAJ as PM and Pravind Jugnauth as deputy prime minister?
It is inappropriate to discuss hierarchy. But as a person, I am equally happy to work with both of them.
 
■ We’ve heard that your son has decided to join politics. Are you happy with that?
He’s a lawyer and is very keen to enter politics. Actually, both my sons are keen. But Alexandre is in London. Adrien has just turned 24 and his entry into politics is still being debated in the family.
 
■ There is talk that one of the hurdles is that you want your son to be fielded in No.6 (Grand Baie/Poudre d’Or) and that there is no consensus about that…
I think Adrien himself wants to be in that constituency because he wants to overcome the existing ethnic hurdles. I have not decided where he should stand as a candidate.
 
■ What are your apprehensions?
He’s still young and he has a lot of time. He’s just got into his profession.
 
■ How about the apprehensions of contributing to the dynasty politics?
‘Duval’ is not a dynasty! It’s a brand! And this is not unique to Mauritius. It is a reality the world over. Look at the US, India or France…
 
■ Suttyhudeo Tengur, president of the Government Hindi Teachers’ Union, said that you are overambitious and you are looking for too much…
I’m not surprised at all by what he said. He has never appreciated my work.
 
■ Are you asking for too much?
You do not know what I’m asking for!
 
■ Twenty-five investitures for your party?!
First, I must say that we are talking about investitures for the MSM on one side and then the other investitures going to the other partners. Whether your figure is right or wrong, it represents investitures for all the other parties. So Tengur is wrong!
 
■ You are asking for less than 25 investitures then, since 35 will go to the MSM and the leftovers have to be shared.
Why do you use nasty terms like ‘leftovers’?
 
■OK. Thirty five tickets for the MSM and the remainder for the PMSD and the ML. Does that sound more politically correct?
Yes, the remainder will be divided between the PMSD and the ML.
 
■ So the distribution of investitures is still being discussed, isn’t it?
There haven’t been any problems amongst the three of us, and certainly not between the ML and the PMSD.
 
■If there are no problems, then what is holding you back from forming an alliance and starting to campaign together?
Listen, we are talking about forming the next government for the coming five years. We have to go into every detail and that takes time!
 
■ Do you have 60 candidates to field amongst the three of you?
(Long challenging silence) Do you have doubts about that? Do you think we are fighting for empty seats? Is that your conception of how the opposition works?
 
■Let me rephrase that. Do you have 60 able and competent candidates?
The whole question is to find the best possible people. Not just in terms of gathering votes, but also to represent their constituents and be able to participate actively in government. We have far too many candidates and that is the problem. We are presently shortlisting. 
 
 
Interview published in Weekly's edition of 25-1st OctoberInterview published in Weekly's edition of 25-1st October