| | In praise of… alliances | | | | Modifier la taille du texte: | A | | | A | | |
|
| | Par:- NicholasRainer
On 26/02/2010 |
ALL this talk of alliances is perplexing. It’s hijacking the airwaves, hogging the front pages. The prospect of seeing Labour and the MMM join in unholy matrimony has become something of a monomaniacal obsession, a public health concern. A bit like mahjong in some places. Or Sergio Leone fi lms in others. It’s not our fault, mind you. People want to know! The future of the country is at stake here! Or so we’re told. So we do what we do best. We feed grist to the mill of your curiosity. Ours too, of course. Oh yes, this talk of alliances is a funny old thing indeed. And there’s no end in sight.
In this respect, the 21st century is no different from the last one. We feared the millennium bug. We cowered at the mention of the financial crisis. We spent sleepless nights worrying about swine flu. But these were mere blips on the timeline of history compared to the overpowering Alliance Syndrome. It was. It is. It will be. There’s just no escaping it. You might try to fumble around in the dark, searching for a true purpose to your life but you will never find one. Your soul beats in unison with the hypnotic rhythm of this awkward political courtship.
It’s sad really. But, then again, so are many other things. Like the state of our prisons. Or the realization that Mauritius will never qualify for the FIFA World Cup. Or even the decline of quality children’s TV. You win some. You lose some. Then you lose some more. Never mind that alliances have always been part of our landscape. They’ve come and they’ve gone, tossing us about mercilessly in their wake and dashing our hopes against rocks of cynicism. This one, if it happens, will be no different. Oh no, it’ll be more of the same. Fortunately Tom Waits will be still around to wail that he wants to take the long road home. Life’s small mercies and all that.
So what’s going to happen to us poor denizens of this house of horrors? There’s no telling really. All we can do is hold out our begging bowls and meekly ask for a bit of justice, honesty and accountability. And hope for the best. Or must we? Don’t we have a say in all this? Will we be forever condemned to the role of bystanders? No, actually! If you’re one of those who believes that the average person is decent then it follows that society should be a decent entity. But if that’s so, why are we getting such a raw deal?
Mull over that not-so-rhetorical question for a while. The answer isn’t pretty. In fact, it’s downright grim. But knowledge is power apparently. And it’s not really their fault, is it? It’s ours. Our laziness and complacency have emboldened the political class to an extraordinary degree. Rather than casting the money changers out of the temple, we supplied them with bed and board. More power to them, less to us. It’s the inverse-square law in full Technicolor.
We’ll have to smell the roses some day. Yet something tells me that it won’t be of our own accord. We’ll have to be dragged out of our stupor kicking and screaming. Oh well, at least we’ll have all this talk of alliances to keep us busy. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Starbright | | | How are burdens shared within an alliance?To what extent will the actions of individual members result in benefits that are shared by all allies, and how will the availability of collective benefits affect the level of effort of individual parties? There will be many unanswered questions out there and as far as i'm concerned,i find it very weird that Mauritians gotta vote for an alliance instead for a party. | | | Aregeecee | | | Nicholas, I posted a comment a week or so ago. The alliance "phenomenon" in Mauritius exists because, as you rightly put it, the people of Mauritius comes out of its lethargy every five years or so, gets excited by the mere prospect of who is going to sleep with who this time and finally gets taken for a majestical ride. It stinks, as do all the major politicians - whether their name is Navin, Paul, Xavier, Rashid or Pravind - all one of the same and the "admirable people" of Mauritius does not have the will, nor the desire to put an end to it.
At the end, they have the government they have always deserved and nothing will be different with this one - more of the same. "Allez Maurice, batte batter".
No wonder the young people are disengaged and trying to leave and unwilling to get into politics and change things.
Have you ever wondered why for the last 40 years, major players in politics have had names like Ramgoolam, Jugnauth, Duval and Berenger? Same old story, same old songs, same old repertoire and try to create new songs and give renewed hope. Mauritius has been there, done that, many many times before It DOES NOT work!!!
At the end, I ask you, who's to blame? Those politicians we have got to know so well, for so long now, or those who elect them to continue on with this absurd game of "alliances"?
The people of Mauritius will let us know in a few months, but really, you and I (and countless others, I'm sure) already know the answer, right? | | | Baltazar | | | You are right Nicholas ! Why not stop praising empty barrels and start to make our own sound. What makes me ashamed or more disgusting my obligation to go to the poll is that I do not see the candidate I wish to vote for. I see a lot of stupid, brainless, illiterate political agents, hired bouncers, some under alcohol, drug influences trying aggressively to intimidate voters. Our political giants, self declared as strong, stronger, strongest, do they need these cheap level supporters or they are not so strong as they want to be ? A question of mentality and dignity ! Should we go to the poll or should we stay at home and watch the Walt Disney jungle battle ? Winner or looser won't make any difference. We are condemned to be followers without personal will. Let it be ! | | | Patriot | | | The strategy of Navin to call Berenger for another round of discussions in view of an alliance is a move calculated "avec beaucoup de sang froid". Only Berenger did not see the trap. As always Berenger was prompt to announce the news to the entire nation a few hours later in what he also considered was his calculated move to seal off once and for all the MMM/Labor deal in public opinion and thus ward off any other alliance option that may be pressed upon Navin.
Navin's move was by far more cunning. He has succeeded to get rid, within days, of the high nuisance value, not to say the strong political threat Ramjuttun from Triolet. That was the only objective behind Navin's move. Berenger used ramjuttun to pressurize Navin. Navin used Berenger himself to rid of Ramjuttun. Ramjuttun is no more a threat to Navin. He is rather disgusted and furious at Berenger for using him at will and turning him into a bigger stock of laughter. For sure his burning rage to finish off Navin is now offset. The guy is in total disillusion now and should already be preparing for a fiercer rage against Berenger himself.
End results: Berenger has been hooked in his own ‘panier’. Ramjuttun is out of No 5 in shame. Navin walks away coolly ahead with no commitment to any party. En passant, a message to XLD that his gimmicks of pretending to be a grand casseur packet are not taken seriously at all and he can rather 'leve paquet' if he wants for not being crucial as he pretends to be in the creole equation. The tool used is the Capital Punishment 'gift' to the nation. Any politician with a slight dose of dignity would have resigned by now. Xavier will not. Meanwhile, what could have been a political card for Pravin has also been snatched away. Around 80% of the nation approves Navin’s announcement and say 'YES to Capital Punishment". Indeed an act of genius rarely seen in our local politics. Bien jouer, Navin !
| | | Burn-it | | | En plein dans le mille! | | | Saffiyah | | | While I do agree with the author's opinion that alliances like this come and go, and life goes on, it's not fair to say that we are complacent and lazy. Had we been, nobody would have cared to give their opinions on the hundreds of blogs, radio programs and what's not. We are neither complacent nor lazy, the issue is WHAT CAN WE DO? Say one decides to join politics but with a view of doing things differently, would s/he succeed or would s/he become part of the system? How much of a chance of survival has the one who wants to be different? | | | Mika | | | You must be the only sane voice on that crazy vessel Sir! | | | miharbe | | | Alliances or no alliances, it is all moving down the same old, corrupted, favouritism road. The voters should once for all take matters in their own hands and vote for independent candidates. Change of good fortune will engulf our beloved country. | | | eric | | | The likelyhood of a hung parliament after minority election results in Germany, Italy,Israel,Ireland Canada and perhaps shortly the UK suggests the formation of coalition government would be"a la mode". Like it or not the Ptr with the son of "Le pere de la nation" as leader would be the winner, but without a working majority. The Ptr would do well to wait for the elections results for the choice of a bed partner for a coalition that could last its full term . | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|