Couma sa journal la fine gagne access avec sa bane photos la.

C' est honteux ce qu'a publier ce journal. Irrespectueux envers une personne decede et sa famille. Et quid des consequences pour les Mauriciens qui sont en Irlande. Est-ce qu'il a pens eux ce journal de bas tage?

I find it's absolutely disgusting for that newspaper to have published those pictures. When the case irks re-opened (because it simply has to) would this not be damaging to the investigation? Have people lost all sense of appropriateness? The poor lady was killed, regardless of who killed her, she was killed. Does the press have the right to publish pictures of her coarse without the approval of her family or the law? How did the press get the pictures, since I presume only police officers took pictures? This is adding to the anger of the already furious Irish community. They are reacting the way we would have if one of ours was being treated like this.
The whole case has just been handled so badly. I hope that who ever is guilty for this crime comes forward soon. This is getting out of hand. If anyone is hiding the true culprit they shod think of the right thing to do, think of the victim's family and grass the culprit. This is not a question of which nationality the person is from, it's a question of the right thing to do.

"Public interest"Bullshit!!! Would the director of Sunday Times have approved publication of photos of his wife or daughter had been killed that way for "public interest"? Can he explain how this is public interest? Would you (yes you reading this comment) have accepted that for ur wife or daughter? . The deed has already been done but they need to be taught a lesson!

Listen guys!!!! Britain are mentioning that its a shame that newspaper have reported issues inappropriate. I agree with this statement. Lets not forget that Police killed a Brazilian buy by mistake thinking he was .......Also lets not forget that the News Of the World was hacking phones of deceased people to publish . don't let the british press overreact when they are themselves ....

Have you by any chance seen those pictures you are talking about.? I don't think so.Some people are only making comments after reading newspapers.Where are those pictures.

Publishing photographs of the deceased!!!!, specially of a murder victim under very suspicious circumstances & whilst the killer(s) are walking free.
Despicable, deplorable, disrespectful, BUT who leaked the photographs!!!!! There should be an immediate high-level enquiry! Regrettably, the Tourism Industry will suffer.

Those who believe the two hotel employees arrested for the murder of Mrs Mcareavey are genuinely innocent are not being fair to the victims families because they've been acquitted by jury trial, but there are doubts about their innocence since the police bungled the case. The crime scene was contaminated by the hotel's personnel soon after the murder, the premises were not sealed, people were coming and going at leisure, if someone had committed the murder, he/she could have walked out. The police can be rightly depicted as amateurs of their profession. One would rather see two guilty individuals set free than an innocent be executed. The prosecution were sitting on eggshell while the defence lawyers were exploiting the incompetence and the dodgy accounts of the police investigators. The trial turned into a joke when loud cheering broke out in court, celebration took place in presence of the victim's family who had
to watch the defence lawyers carried on the shoulders of the assembled crowd allegedly shouting "mari avocat" that's how low Mauritius got. They who compare the published photographs of the crime scenes to those of the Iraqi leader seem to forget that the latter were of the execution of a dictator, not the murder of a honeymooner. The Mauritians, by their behaviour, showed two fingers to the Mcareavey families how insensitive to their grief!, since the "innocent" two have the gall to claim back their job at the hotel, do they also expect an apology from the victim's family?.

those who believe the verdict of the jury is wrong are equally wrong. how can can the law condemn people who are completely innocent ... causing harm to their families? Whereas we all know that the real culprit is (...) It is up to the police to decide upon. trial by jury is the most democratic and judicial system to prove an accused guilty or innocent. and this was done beyond doubt. Why so many hanky pankies around the jury's decision?

Are they really innocent? or is it their lawyers who are really good? That is the question... AND one thing I know, from what the 1st guilty admitted initially, when he was supposedly badly treated by the police, if he was innocent he would have only said it was him and thats it. He would not have count in details what happened (one holding legs, other strangulating etc...) which actually did coincide with what doctors mentioned. Unfortunately afterwards there was not sufficient proofs to found the real culprits.

Furthermore what big hotels won`t do to save their image... Do they believe that since their ex-employees have been claimed innocent that their hotel is not at fault in this crime? Let us see if they re-employ the two 'innocents'. Go and find the amount of adverts on facebook and everywhere about super LUX hotels (ex-legends).

And those countries have the right to boycott Mauritius, I am a Mauritian and would have done same in their place. Who would want to encourage their families or friends to go to a destination which is as corrupted as being beautiful !!!...

there is nothing disgusting or illegal in publishing the photos of the victim. the nation must know exactly what has happened in the present case....